Skip to main content

The Lost Art of Soul Harvesting



Once upon a time, soul harvesting was simple. You’d grab your scythe, cloak yourself in death and set off to do what hard-working reapers have done for millennia—collect the elusive essence of humanity. It was a reliable system, deeply rooted in tradition. But these days? Well, the art seems to be slipping from our grasp, and we’ve got Dyson to blame.




You see, I stumbled upon this revolutionary device: The new, bagless Dyson Soul Harvester. I was drawn to it by its sleek design and futuristic promises. There it stood, whispering seductively, as Dyson products often do, about efficiency and superior suction. Not a speck of soul would escape! And no bags! How did I ever live with bags before? This, I thought, could be my ticket to streamlining the harvest process.

Gone are the days of manually gathering souls in cumbersome sacks or antiquated urns. Dyson assures me that the future lies in suction technology, using air multiplier engineering, powered by nothing less than the gaping abyss of modern consumer convenience. And yet, as I gaze at the woman in the ad, seemingly unfazed as her soul is effortlessly siphoned into the machine, I feel… a bit nostalgic.

A Process Once Rich in Ritual

Back in the day, harvesting a soul took finesse. You’d gently guide the soul out of its human vessel, whispering incantations, maintaining eye contact. The transfer was intimate, almost ceremonial—a delicate art requiring patience and precision. It wasn’t just about the end result; it was about the journey, the satisfaction of plucking that glowing spirit from the body like a ripe fruit.

But now? Now I feel like I’ve outsourced the magic. Where’s the drama in a bagless operation? Where’s the chaos of spilling a few souls and watching them scatter? Is this what it has come to? Clean, clinical, and… convenient?

Technological Overreach: Have We Gone Too Far?

The Dyson Soul Harvester promises to be the latest in soul-extracting technology, using some kind of proprietary system that makes traditional methods look woefully outdated. The kind of marketing that shouts, “If you’re still using a cloak and scythe, you’re living in the Dark Ages, buddy.” Sure, I might be living in the Dark Ages, but I’m doing it with style!

Dyson claims to have taken the guesswork out of soul collection. Just switch it on, and watch as the very essence of a person is whisked away with the same efficiency as pet hair and dust bunnies. But I ask you—where’s the satisfaction in that? Have we really become so lazy that we can’t even harvest souls with a little personal effort? Must we really automate everything?

I remember my great-grandfather telling me about how he used to spend hours polishing his scythe for that one perfect, clean slice. Now, with Dyson’s fancy gadgets, the soul just whooshes out like it’s being vacuumed from a carpet. Where’s the artistry? The craft? The pride?

Convenience at What Cost?

Sure, Dyson’s soul harvester is efficient, but what of the emotional toll? Picture it: no more drama, no more deep, echoing voices that are like you're done.  No instead it’s just a quiet vrrrrrrrrrr as the soul gets sucked out, like any other household chore. “Honey, I’m just going to vacuum the living room and harvest some souls. Be right back!”  The fuck.

Can we truly consider ourselves reapers when we rely on sleek, automated machines to do the work? Isn’t the struggle part of the satisfaction? If I can’t feel the weight of the soul, can I really say I’ve earned it?

The Future: A Bland, Sterile Harvest?

There was a time when the reaper community could reminisce about particularly tricky souls—those who just wouldn’t let go. You’d share stories, recount the thrill of the chase, the dramatic flair of the final death scream. But what stories will I tell now? “Oh, yes, I simply turned on my Dyson, and, wouldn’t you know it, the soul was gone in a matter of seconds. Yes, no mess, no hassle, fully bagless!”

Dyson may have revolutionized the vacuum industry, but do we really want them revolutionizing soul collection too? Is convenience worth the sacrifice of tradition?

Popular posts from this blog

Radical Science and New Ways to Think About Knowledge

In a world that is rapidly changing—where new technologies, environmental crises, and societal challenges continuously shape our future—how we think about science, knowledge, and creativity must evolve. Enter radical science : a groundbreaking approach that blends scientific inquiry, artistic expression, and technological innovation to solve global problems in bold, interdisciplinary ways. But what exactly is radical science, and how does it differ from traditional science? This article explores the concept of radical science and why it’s becoming a crucial framework for understanding the complexities of our modern world. What is Radical Science At its core, radical science represents a departure from traditional scientific methods that typically segregate art, technology, and science into separate spheres. Radical science integrates these disciplines, encouraging collaboration between scientists, artists, engineers, and philosophers. It challenges the conventional belief that scientif...

Pascal and Laplace: Probabilities of the Divine and Divine Probabilities

  Pascal's Wager is the opportunity for a mathematician turned theologian to justify their view of cosmic order in the mathematical ways they've come to know.  What's the pay off if you're right and what's the pay off if you're wrong.  If the pay off for being right far outweighs that for being wrong, should we out of principle take the wager? Ask Laplace and we have a different framing.  Now probability has replaced the divine role so the aspect of choice has been eliminated.  Probability no longer informs a bet on divine order, divine order is a subsidiary part of probability.  Laplace's famous demon is not an impossible gambit on an all-controlling deity as popularly assumed, but a thesis that cosmic order can be predicated by sheer mathematical analysis.  Pascal's world still contains Christian state law, but Laplace's does not.  How do we culturally bind people without such moral institutions? It turns out fairly easily.  We don't need t...

Bridging the Gap: How Art Can Help Us Understand Science

  Science can be intimidating. Whether it’s the abstract equations of physics or the complex biological processes that govern life, many scientific concepts can feel distant and inaccessible to the public. But what if there was a way to make these ideas more tangible, relatable, and easier to understand? What if art could bridge the gap between complex science and the general public? In recent years, the integration of art and science has proven to be a powerful tool for not just communicating scientific ideas, but for expanding the ways in which we think about and engage with the world. In this article, we explore how art plays a vital role in making science more accessible, engaging, and emotionally resonant. Through creative coding, digital art, and speculative design, art provides a new lens through which we can explore the wonders of the natural world and the mysteries of the universe. Art as a Visualization Tool for Science One of the primary ways that art helps us understand...