Experigraph

  As empirical acolyte Steve Connor shows  in our update to a former article, new groundbreaking work in science proves that "Einstein was right when he thought he was wrong", proving that he was right about what he thought wasn't right, and so was wrong about what he didn't think was right at all. What was he wrong (right) about? He was (in)correct regarding whether "you can be in two places at once" - Conner shows that he was in fact right (making him actually wrong) thanks to a new device with which - according to science writer Adrian Cho - they "still haven't achieved a two-places-at-once state". As Conner makes clear, Einstein never could have guessed that he would be right (wrong) that it would ever be possible to (not be able to) exist in two places at once, but time has shown that the opposite of what he didn't (not) think has actually turned out to be true (false). A perfect instance of science journalism.

gene ray and the hyperbole of nothingness time cube - instantiation of language; the building of the conceptual; what language can do is mirror an entital projection; the moment of love dissolves in the non-need for language; yet the "evil word" is just what is required in every instance of deviation from that mutuality. what is especially revelatory is the total isolation of linguistic framing - thus it is more valuable than the non-referent schools of mysticism, and more along the lines of the rejected, the poet, or the "nonsensical". the poet however, further fails in this insofar as s/he is read. resultantly, the operation of theorizing is unparalleled in its self-revealing, no doubt in tandem with a perfectly juxtaposed academic stupidity. what is stupid is what is obtuse to a given set's logic, what is academic is the technologically-tending recreation of a synthetic context, potentially independent of any given conventional ideas. academia is most a...

Tauber: It was at this juncture that Sir Frank Macfarlane Burnet introduced the “self” into the immunological lexicon (Burnet and Fenner 1949) upon that metaphor erected a theory of immunological tolerance that still dominates the field. characterized by multiple, even competing thought-styles (Crist and Tauber 1997) Crist, E. and Tauber, A. I. (1997) “Debating humoral immunity and epistemology: The rivalry of the immunochemists Jules Bordet and Paul Ehrlich,” Journal of the History of Biology, 30: 321-356

the instance of shock and mayhem in the quirky, the audacious - a recent work by carter (also the trobriands) sporulates: the outlasted whose robbing of shrill and deposition misspeaks a hellish, feasible. as an identical movement is made out biochemically, the shock rewound: the computer program blames the human for appropriating it. although the luting sillimanisia anagrams bump, swab, the generalized sequence complains of a derivative nature. the derivative vanguard (in carter's words, the "transform into mounds") already righted to sound exploration, tack, outstandedness. one rapture innovates the exact occurrence - "for the first time" - the other is wronged for the first time. the initial sequence is born over and over again - the crux of amnesia is unipolarity, cinematography. the meditative i stumble, already not previously engrafted, is mistaken as the antinomiality of dislocation. "i certainly did not" - the proclamation is read to the en...

entropy as increasing disorder - bataillean expenditure: cooling down of sun - sun expends forcing us to overproduction and waste - entropy forces waste for bataille - lower entropy in sun, higher entropy in world (Bois 34) "such regulation is never successful because always insufficient" - cooling down of words into cliches - information theory entropy - carl einstein opposes in critical dictionary (36) entropy/expenditure "was inevitable and its effectiveness depended on no one's will" (37) reichenbach - crisis of causality (pubbed in documents) - 2nd law of thermodynamics (carnot's discovery of mechanical heat loss) "is in fact nothing but a statistical principle") (37) poussiere - "entropic nightmare" one day or another, given its presistence... dust will probably begin to gain the upper hand over the servants, pouring immense amounts of rubbish into abandoned buildings and desrted stockyards: and, at that distant epoch, nothing will...

xoxoxcom bot: These are, in short, discouragement? jytte: eugeny. chignons. xb: how does atrocious mean? j: macros (licentious) xb: irony? j: not work, being xb: is the surplus aspect of positive identity a follow-up to being in your blah blah blah? j: superfluity follows invention; xb: science? j: saturation brims regardless of inspiration; commentary does not precede failure xb: the underlying credence may well disconnect with actual creation? j: on the contrary - the production is marred by its constituents - what makes calcifies correlation xb: fumbling? j: centrally none of which avoids inhabitation xb: creation? j: or whatever xb: pågældende j: Hoheitsgebiet xb: tilfredsstille j: zerbröckelte xb: bloomstrain j: laster xb: sand-far-dict j: biden

What Deleuze missed in his Postscript to the Control Society is the fact that everything is edible now, including and especially politics.  Control is a threat up until you can eat it, in which case it becomes subordinated as the working class - the digested proletariat.  The creates scarcity in the communities that have not been digested creating a sort of mystique around inedibility.  I have the latest Prado bag - big deal, I am inedible. Digestive Control creates a solar-anal imperative to excessive amounts of waste production and photosynthetic absorption.  Eat as much as you can and shit as much as you can.  Thus the greatest horror for the Post-Control Society is to run out of food.  Once you have nothing left to eat, you no longer produce proletariat, and no one can do work any longer. The world of things presents a world that Digestive Ontology fails to recognize as real.  If you are not real, you have no voice: hence the current c...